« | January 2013 | » | ||||
![]() |
||||||
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
Ned and Alex and I get about halfway up the block from our apartment building this morning when Alex starts stopping in his walk.
“Bus?” Alex says, “Bus?”
“Alex, there is no bus this morning. Strike. We have to take the subway this morning, with Ned.”
We take the subway: Ned will get off at E. 68th Street, like he always does, for his school. Difference is, Alex and I will ride with him and travel on for another six stops on the 6 line to the street where Alex’s school is. “Ned, is this about normal for the 6?” I ask midway through the ride. He shrugs. “A little heavier than normal?” He nods.
Earlier, after Ned had clicked on the local news station over his cereal, he asked what was going on with this school bus strike. “Ned,” I said, “here’s the deal. It used to be people were kept according to how long they’d be on a job. In other words, being senior meant they laid off people junior to you who made less money. But now, they lay off people who are senior and who make more money because they figure it’s better to keep the people who make less money.” I was laid off in 2009 because of such reasoning.
Now they want to do this to the senior drivers. Union officials said New York City bus drivers will stay on strike until the city agrees to put a job protection clause back into their contract. More than 8,000 bus drivers and matrons went on strike Wednesday morning, meaning some 150,000 students (one of them Alex) to find other ways to get to class. “The first days will be extremely chaotic,” said NYC schools chancellor Dennis Walcott. Drivers with years of seniority worry their experience will make them too expensive to hire unless job protection provisions are included.
Most of the kids affected have what our society, when somebody else’s money isn’t at stake, has called “special needs.” I sort of see the union's point, but I also sort of wish they'd waited five years. Last time NYC had a strike like this, I was a high school junior and schoolchildren of my own were a dreaded thought (though a wife who looks like Jill certainly was not). Grandpa calls to ask if there’s any problem with Ned’s transportation. No, Ned takes the subway to and from school himself, and he often stops after school to play football on the playground or do his homework in the library.
On the comments section of the local news site some parents say traffic is great without school buses – drivers who flash their yellows with only one car behind them, drivers who slash across lanes – and that parents should take their kids to school anyway. Others point out that parents who’ve just secured new jobs or who work on hourly contract lose a boss’s regard or real dollars because of this mess. Some other readers say isn’t it all too bad?
Yes. But who speaks for us? Alex and the people like, our family and the people like us? Who speaks for me and my son when that one car behind the flashing-yellow bus decides Screw it and slips by the side of my son by just a few inches? All the agencies and all the government initials that seem to be there when we want something they can provide are absent in the busing news stories. That leaves this reporter and this dad with the idea that we’re toothless in this argument. I wish people would just admit it.